Award-winning nonprofit media in the public interest, serving San Diego's inland region

Award-winning nonprofit media in the public interest, serving San Diego's inland region

VINES AND STEINS – ORFILA VINEYARD & WINERY

Printer-friendly versionBy Richard Noel Orfila employee Dolores Castaneda pours a generous taste for Shari Zollo (right) of Vista, who enjoyed the festivities with Barbara Deuel and Drea Zollo Bush (both of Oceanside). “Oh yes, it’s Eighties night!” For all those who still wear their sunglasses at night, you could have worn them to Orfila Vineyards’ tasting room as the crew kept the doors open late on October 23rd for a special evening of uncorked fun.  With a 1980s music theme, wine club members and other visitors enjoyed listening to blasts from the past while sipping the Escondido winery’s latest hits.  Tasting room manager Benjamin Wier put together what may be the first of many more late-night events to come, and pulled it off with the flair of a high school reunion.  Printer-friendly version

SAN DIEGO COUNTY TURNS BLUE:  MORE REGISTERED DEMOCRATS THAN REPUBLICANS, REGISTRAR REPORTS

Printer-friendly version Democratic voter registration volunteers cheer as Party Chair Jess Durfee announces San Diego County now has more registered Democrats than Republicans. NOVEMBER 2, 2008 (San Diego) — “We have, after 24 years, returned San Diego County to the blue column,” San Diego County Democratic Party Chairman Jess Durfee announced at a press conference today. According to the latest data released by the Registrar of Voters, the County now has 541,039 Democrats and 540,006 Republicans.  Ray Lutz and Kristy Mundt, past and current president of East County Democratic Club, at Parkway Plaza in El Cajon, where they registered hundreds of new voters shortly before the registration deadline. “In just the last 11 months, 105,000 people have registered as Democrats in our County. That’s ten times the number of people who live in Wasilla, Alaska,” quipped Durfee.  All registrations were done by party volunteers—no paid registration workers were used. Durfee credits a surge among Obama supporters as well as enthusiastic party activists and 40 Democratic Clubs that helped registered people at shopping malls,  street fairs, beaches,  new citizen naturalization ceremonies, and door-to-door.   In East County, La Mesa’s Democratic registration edge has widened and El Cajon, though still red, has narrowed the party divide. “We registered 560 voters on the last weekend before the Election—and only 46 were Republicans,” said Kristy Mundt, president of the East County Democratic Club.  The Registrar has not yet released data on an additional 15,000 to 20,000 new voter registrations received in the final hours before deadline, but given the recent countywide trend of ten Democrats to one Republican among newly registered voters, it appears likely that Democrats will widen their lead. “No longer will San Diego County be part of a base of support for Republicans,” Durfee concluded.  “Now, San Diego County will be a base of support for the Democratic Party to win state and national elections.” Printer-friendly version

DANGERS OF LIVING NEAR CELL PHONE TOWERS RAISED

Printer-friendly versionLa Mesa Council holds hearing Nov. 5 on proposal to erect cell phone tower in Lake Murray area By Miriam Raftery When Mom asked me to look into possible health hazards posed by cell phone panel antennas that a church in her neighborhood wants to put up, I expected to find reassuring facts to allay Mom’s concerns.  Instead, I found deeply disturbing data that makes me wonder why the public is not being informed about health risks—and why our government seems intent on covering up troubling truths. Cell phone companies and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration assert that cell phone towers don’t pose health risks to the public.  Some studies support this assertion, but other studies suggest just the opposite. Harvard-trained Dr. Andrew Weil at the University of Arizona’s medical center recently observed, “In January 2008, the National Research Council (NRC), an arm of the National Academy of Sciences and the National Academy of Engineering, issued a report saying that we simply don’t know enough about the potential health risks of long-term exposure to RF energy from cell phones themselves, cell towers, television towers, and other components of our communications system. The scientists who prepared the report emphasized, in particular, the unknown risks to the health of children, pregnant women, and fetuses as well as of workers whose jobs entail high exposure to RF (radiofrequency) energy….Because so much of cell phone technology is new and evolving, we don’t have data on the consequences of 10, 20 or 30 years worth of exposure to the RF energy they emit,”  Weil concluded.  The report called for long-term safety studies on all wireless devices including cell phones, computers, and cell phone towers. A 2006  report issued by the World Health Organization (WHO) offered some reassurance and found no scientific evidence that radiofrequency signals from cell towers cause adverse health effects.  The report noted that up to five times more of the RF signals from FM radio and television (than from cell towers) are absorbed by the body with no known adverse effects on health in the more than 50 years that radio and TV broadcast stations have been operating. But an Australian study found that children living near TV and FM broadcast towers, which emit similar radiation to cell towers, developed leukemia at three times the rate of children living over seven miles away. If you live within a quarter mile of a cell phone antenna or tower, you may be at risk of serious harm to your health, according to a German study cited at  www.EMF-Health.com, a site devoted to exposing hazards associated with electromagnetic frequencies from cell phone towers and other sources. Cancer rates more than tripled among people living within 400 meters of cell phone towers or antennas, a German study found.  Those within 100 meters were exposed to radiation at 100 times normal levels.  An Israeli study found risk of cancer quadrupled among people living within 350 meters (1,148 feet) of a cell phone transmitter—and seven out of eight cancer victims were women.  Both studies focused only on people who had lived at the same address for many years. Other studies have found that levels of radiation emitted from cell phone towers can damage cell tissues and DNA, causing miscarriage, suppressing immune function, and causing other health problems. Astoundingly, the federal government does not allow rejection of a cell phone tower based on health risks, according to a 2005 article. A Google search found no evidence that this situation has changed. Yet over 1.9 million cell phone towers and antennae have been approved nationwide without federal studies to assure safety of those living nearby. How many cell phone towers and antennas are in your neighborhood?  Find out at www.antennasearch.com.  I plugged in my address on Mt. Helix, hardly an urban stronghold, and was astounded to discover that there are 96 cell phone towers, 286 antennas and 2 proposals for new towers within four miles of my home!  So how about Mom’s neighborhood, where an Evangelical church insists a new tower is needed? Mom gets perfectly fine cell phone reception, and so do the neighbors she’s spoken with—not surprising since there are already 113  towers and 335 antennas within a four-mile radius.  Churches, schools, fire stations, and other buildings are increasingly erecting cell phone towers or antennas because cell phone companies are willing to pay rental fees of hundreds or even thousands of dollars a month—welcome infusions for cash-strapped budgets. But at what cost to the public’s health?  There are young children in Mom’s neighborhood, less than one block from the proposed cell phone antenna site. In Sweden, the government requires interventions to protect the public from electromagnetic frequencies.  Why isn’t the U.S. government paying attention to this potential risk to public safety? If you wish to share your views on the T-Mobile proposed cell phone tower at 5777 Lake Murray Blvd. (near Marengo Avenue), the La Mesa City Council will hold a public meeting on Wednesday, November 5th at 7 p.m. in Council Chambers at the La Mesa City Hall, 8130 Allison Ave., La Mesa. Printer-friendly version